Friday, May 20, 2011

The Case of the Missing $8,000: Part II

Is Mike Chitwood dissatisfied? Yes. Is he angry? Yes. Is he jumping to conclusions? No.
“The evidence custodian states he thinks he remembers counting the money back in 2009,” Chitwood explained. “There was a distraction. The money was put in the evidence room to be counted the next day and he (the evidence tekkie) seemed to feel that he could have inadvertantly burned the money during an evidence burn.”
Evidence burn? How about this instead: A police dog ate it.

Bring on the polygraphs.

My print column is up.

0 Comments:

Post a Comment

Subscribe to Post Comments [Atom]

<< Home