Wednesday, February 27, 2008

Guns Good for Gays

Is gun control bad for gay people? Gaypatriot thinks so. So do a lot of other people.

UPDATE: And gays ain't the only ones, according to John Stossel.

8 Comments:

Anonymous Anonymous said...

Come on! Where's the blog post about Sunday's "Who's making over $100K in Delco" article??? I had a boatload of Linda Cartisano/hairspray jokes ready to go!!!

February 27, 2008 at 9:37 AM 
Anonymous Anonymous said...

Prediction: Our resident Lib Hypocrite, David D, will see guns in the hands of gays as just fine while still advocating grabbing everyone else’s right to self defense.

February 27, 2008 at 10:00 AM 
Anonymous Anonymous said...

Randal you are right, Diano will want gays to have guns to protect them from "bigots" like us, but wil not allow us to have guns to protect ourselves from the psychopathic killers that lurk among us.

Seems fair - NOT! As for the "bigot" reference, it is the name the libs and gays call anyone who thinks that homosexuality is unnatural or immoral.

February 27, 2008 at 11:50 AM 
Blogger David Diano said...

This comment has been removed by the author.

February 28, 2008 at 2:40 AM 
Anonymous Anonymous said...

Ok Diano, I get it. You don't understand that the killers that lurk among us tell us who they are primarily in gun free zones. Their calling card is pulling out a gun and killing people.

What about homosexuals, Dave? Should they be allowed to arm themselves for personal or community protection?

Oh, and lest I forget to ask, is homosexual sodomy just as normal as intercourse between a man and a woman?

February 28, 2008 at 7:20 AM 
Anonymous Anonymous said...

Hehehe... Isn't he fun, Anon?

Can't you just feel Dave's bigoted hatred?

February 28, 2008 at 9:51 AM 
Anonymous Anonymous said...

Rarely do we see more blatant Liberal hypocrisy than in the gun debate.
I loved it a couple years ago when Commie Rosie O. said that all guns should be removed from society. And then she got egg all over her stupid fat face when it turned out that her own kids bodyguard packs heat. So she was saying that her children are more important and worthy of protection but yours aren’t.

And any Lib who really dislikes the Second Amendment should have the courage to stand by their convictions and post a sign on their front lawns proclaiming theirs to be a “This Is A Gun Free Home!”. But we never see such signs, do we? This is because, for all their weeping noise, the Lib cowards still accept the inherent protection the 2nd gives them in that criminals don’t know if theirs is an armed house or not.

Come on, Lib Dave, you’re the most vocal anti-gun dope here. Show us some stones and post that sign on your lawn for all to see! Either that or STFU about it.

February 28, 2008 at 10:33 AM 
Anonymous Anonymous said...

umm, doesn't every citizen hold the right to bear arms? or did Jefferson scribble in the corner of the constitution something about excluding the gays? Or wait, are we talking about illegals here, or gay illegals? If so, I agree that gay illegals do not have the right to bear arms.


I think Gil threw out this softball for a reaction for fun. Where's my Linda Cartisano article?

February 29, 2008 at 8:39 AM 

Post a Comment

Subscribe to Post Comments [Atom]

<< Home